Education Hub.

JANUARY 03, 2025

Will 2025 be a hot year for IPOs?

Family office Dubai
  • The outlook is looking a lot more exciting for IPOs this year, with companies from an eclectic mix of industries and geographies looking to make their debuts.
  • Unfortunately, IPOs tend to deliver poor long-term returns for investors, and they generally underperform the broader market.
  • But historical data shows you can do five things to turn the odds in your favor if you want to get in on an IPO: avoid SPACs, go for companies that have big sales, avoid buzzy firms that aren’t profitable, favor VC-backed firms, and prioritize firms in the tech sector.
The past year wasn’t exactly a breakout year for initial public offerings (IPOs). While there were some standout stock launches in the US and India, the global scene stayed pretty quiet. That could change in the year ahead, though. Stock markets have been rising, inflation and key interest rates have been cooling, and the US president-elect has hinted at some business-friendly changes – and that all suggests a warmer, more welcoming IPO climate. So, after a few chilly years, some companies look ready to dive in and make a splashy debut.
How is the IPO pipeline looking for 2025?

More than 300 companies are expected to go public worldwide in 2025 – with about 180 of them expected to list in New York. European fintech favorites Klarna and Revolut could be among the new names on Wall Street’s “big board”. And India – which stole the IPO spotlight in 2024 with a 149% surge in IPO value – is set for another record-breaking year, with heavyweights like Reliance Jio and Tata Passenger Electric Mobility expected to float their shares.

Now, none of these launches are a sure thing at this point, but here are some of the most-talked-about IPO possibilities for 2025 – and why these firms are making a buzz:

ChatGPT creator OpenAI is looking to scale its tech while managing massive computing costs, making its potential IPO a test of whether generative AI can be profitable.

In fintech, Stripe processes over $1 trillion in payments annually, and Klarna has moved beyond the “buy now, pay later” service that made it a star and pushed into subscription services and AI-driven credit.


And in India, there’s Reliance Jio, a digital services giant with a half-billion users, and Tata Passenger Electric Mobility with its goal of dominating India’s EV market.

In cloud and AI infrastructure, CoreWeave provides alternatives to Big Tech’s cloud dominance, and Databricks powers AI-driven data insights for enterprises.

Meanwhile, SpaceX’s Starlink is transforming rural internet access, and Shein continues to redefine global fast fashion economics with its supply chain model.

But if you ask me, some of the most exciting IPOs might come from the more niche corners of the market. Cerebras Systems, for example, is a standout in AI hardware, pushing the boundaries of machine learning with its cutting-edge processors.

Neo4j, a pioneer in graph database technology, is quietly revolutionizing how businesses uncover insights from complex data relationships – think everything from fraud detection to recommendation systems.

Meanwhile, Plaid has become the unsung hero of fintech, seamlessly connecting apps like Venmo and Robinhood to traditional banks, with the potential to drive even deeper financial integration.

And finally, Turo – which has been dubbed the “Airbnb for cars” – is bringing a fresh take to mobility, enabling peer-to-peer car rentals in a way that feels tailor-made for today’s sharing economy.

Is it time to get your IPO dancing shoes on, then?

IPOs can be exhilarating – with their buzzy young companies, massive growth potential, and the thrill of being part of the next big thing. And the success of recent high-profile listings like Reddit might even have you thinking IPOs are a one-way ticket to riches.

But here’s the thing: the hard data paints a less glamorous picture and shows that excitement doesn’t always mean a smart investment. See, despite those first-day trading spikes, research by “Mr. IPO” Jay Ritter suggests that IPOs tend to have a poor long-term track record for investors. From 1980 through 2022, the majority of IPOs lost money over the three- and five-year periods that followed their debut, with 37% losing more than half their value over three years. He found that the average IPO stock bought at the publicly available closing price on the first trading day returned about 6% annualized over three years. Meanwhile, an index of all U.S.-listed stocks returned about 11% annualized over the same period. Put more simply, buying the index would have been more profitable.

There are a couple of reasons why IPOs don’t live up to the hype. For starters, most investors can’t buy in at the offer price. These shares are typically reserved for big institutional players. For the average investor, getting in at this stage just isn’t possible. And, usually, by the time these stocks make their grand entrance on the open market, their prices have already spiked. So regular investors are probably buying in at prices that are way less juicy. And that can have a huge effect on returns: Ritter found that jumping in at the first day’s closing price, rather than the initial offer price, can slash three-year returns by nearly half.

Another reason is the existence of lock-up risk: bigwigs like founders, employees, and early bird investors are usually handcuffed from selling their shares for a few months post-IPO. And once that lock-up period ends, there’s often a mad dash to sell, flooding the market with shares and driving the price down. And don’t forget about the tug-of-war in interests, with venture capitalists, underwriters, and early investors itching to cash out big at the IPO.

Behavioral biases also increase the risk of an overhyped company trading above its fundamental value. After all, many investors forget that for every Tesla, there is at least one WeWork (the company lost 99% since its 2021 debut and recently filed for bankruptcy). There’s a reason why legendary investor Warren Buffett has called investing in IPOs “a stupid game”.

So what’s the opportunity?

The sad truth is that the IPO playing field isn’t exactly level. But that doesn’t mean every IPO is a no-go for investors. Picking the right one can still be a win. However, we’ve dug deep into Ritter’s data, and we’ve discovered three simple things you can do to tip the scales in your favor:

Watch those sales figures. Companies raking in over $100 million in sales usually fare better post-IPO (with the exception of the biopharm startups). VC-backed companies with sales over $100 million do significantly better. So it’s worth remembering that the smaller the company, the riskier – and less profitable – it tends to be.

And keep an eye on profitability. Companies that are already profitable when they go public tend to do better. On average, unprofitable firms have shown barely any returns over three years, while profitable ones have notched an average of 34% gains. And that’s far better, but it’s still below general market performance.

Tech is your friend. Historical stock data leans pretty favorably toward tech sector companies. They’ve generally outperformed those in other sectors after the debut day.

One final word, remember that past performance is no guarantee of future results. Also, No matter how you choose to invest, it’s always a good idea to make sure you’re not too concentrated in your investment exposure.

At Vantage Capital, we’re here to help our clients with investment advisory, also in IPOs. We usually favour a diversified approach to portfolio management.


For a more detailed view, please contact one of Vantage Capital’s advisors.